— Donald Dunbar, in the Poetry Foundation blog
I have been reading a lot of biographies lately, mostly of Wilde and Lord Alfred Douglas. They have left me wondering if “that which is the man” can ever be captured in a biography.
In life you never experience a person the way you do in a biography. You never get an overview of a whole life– the same person in his context as a worker, a family man, a lover, a friend, a debtor, in all of his moods: when he is up, when he is down. You have impressions of people. You know parts of them. A biographer tries to harmonize all of the impressions he or she can collect from people who caught these glimpses, who knew the person in part.
Who has the truth? Is the opinion of a person who dislikes you, colored by the memory of a bad experience less “true” than the memory of the person who was delighted by you? Is the truth the middle ground of these two poles or are you actually both things at the same time– a thoughtless person and a thoughtful person, depending on the context?
(Read the full article via the link)
The two characters were created together. I consciously thought of their relationship as the mountain, where earth meets heaven. Ian is “earthy.” So he likes food, he is physical and sensual. Paul is the one with his head in the clouds. Ian teaches Paul to live in the moment and to get in touch with his physical nature, and Paul teaches Ian to appreciate the spiritual.
I think Ian’s earthiness appeals to people. He is not self-conscious in areas where a lot of us are. He is not worried about his physical attractiveness, and he doesn’t seem to be particularly concerned about what anyone thinks about his sexuality. Those are areas where a lot of us are hung up. This doesn’t mean he has no issues. He has a lot of them, just in other areas. I think of Paul as being someone who has romantic ideas about love, he wants love to be spiritual and transcendent, but he has detached love from the sensual world. He talks about the body and blood of Christ and the physicality of that, and yet it is all intellectual for him. He can’t appreciate his own incarnation. Ian knows he is sexy, but he doesn’t quite believe that he can be loved.
At this time in their lives these two men need each other. The relationship that brings each of them back to health is also one that is risky and could tear them apart.
The process of creating a character, for me, is quite subconscious.
— Interview with author Laura Lee on the novel Angel on The Readdicts
— Literary Agents Discuss the Publishing Industry, Daily Progress
— Zadie Smith
— Orhan Pamuk (via pavorst)
(via wordpainting)
— Henry Miller
— Ludmila Ulitskaya
— Kurt Vonnegut
— E.L. Doctrorow